DEPARTMENT
Clearly labeled perspective. Signed columns, long-form analysis, and commentary from a range of voices.
Charlie Kirk may have been a polarizing figure, but he believed in the power of conversation across differences. In a time of political violence and hatred, his death reminds us that dialogue, empathy, and understanding are essential to preserving democracy and our shared humanity.
At one of America’s most elite universities, I expected open debate and fearless inquiry. Instead, I found silence—an unspoken rule that Christian thought belongs behind closed doors. This essay exposes how elite campuses celebrate diversity while quietly excluding faith from intellectual life. It’s a call for universities to rediscover real inclusion—where Christian voices aren’t merely tolerated, but respected as essential to understanding truth, human dignity, and the moral foundations of education itself.
Conservation has always been conservative—anchored in stewardship, prudence, and national strength since Theodore Roosevelt. Yet today’s GOP often dismisses environmental concerns, allowing the left’s alarmism to dominate. True conservatism demands pragmatism: rejecting apocalyptic rhetoric while embracing innovation in nuclear, geothermal, and balanced energy solutions. Protecting resources is not capitulation but patriotism. To secure prosperity and leadership, Republicans must reclaim conservation as a cornerstone of American exceptionalism.
From energy bills to education, from welfare to sanctuary cities, these ideas trap people in dependency, stifle opportunity, and erode self-reliance.
And that’s the point. Because an independent citizen doesn’t need big government—or the Democratic Party.
So when liberals promise to “help,” remember: what they’re really offering is control.
In his early high school years, Aidan Chao found himself drawn to local Californian politics following a series of burglaries in his predominantly Asian neighborhood of Arcadia. With the community shaken up and neighbors concerned about rising crime across the region, Chao did what most barely-teenagers wouldn’t think of. He called the mayor, April Verlato. Thinking, like most, that a secretary would pick up or he would get the answering machine, Chao was incredibly surprised when Verlato answered the phone herself.
Multiple studies confirm a striking trend: liberals report higher rates of depression and anxiety than conservatives. This isn’t coincidence—it’s a pattern tied to ideology. Left-wing worldviews emphasize victimhood, external control, and systemic oppression, fostering helplessness and despair. Meanwhile, conservatives, who prioritize personal responsibility and resilience, report greater happiness. If progressive policies actually worked, wouldn’t blue states see better mental health? Instead, depression thrives under leftist governance. So, the real question is: why adopt an ideology linked to misery?
Modern slavery is a stark reminder that history’s darkest chapters still cast long shadows. Despite global progress, forced labor, human trafficking, and exploitation persist in various forms, echoing America’s troubled past. Vulnerable populations, including migrant workers and marginalized communities, remain at high risk. While legal frameworks exist, enforcement gaps and economic pressures allow these injustices to continue. To combat modern slavery, awareness, policy reform, and ethical consumer choices are critical. This issue is not just historical—it’s happening today. How can we learn from the past to fight for a just future?
A wealthy white couple’s casual justification of paying undocumented workers $5 per hour exposes the hypocrisy within certain progressive circles. While claiming liberal values and pro-immigration stances, they openly advocate for labor exploitation, dismissing comparisons to slavery by arguing “slaves were treated much worse.” Their aggressive defense of these contradictions, combined with elitist attitudes and disdain for “common folks,” reveals how some privileged liberals have created a playbook for modern exploitation while maintaining a progressive facade. Meanwhile, families spend thousands on legal immigration, highlighting the disconnect between claimed values and actual practices.
Bold leaders thrive on risk-taking and raw authenticity, traits driven by biological factors like testosterone. These characteristics generate transformative results but invite controversy. Where conservative leaders leverage imperfection to shatter the status quo, progressives crumble under self-imposed “purity tests” that paralyze innovation. The decisive authenticity of leaders like Trump, Musk, and Branson creates deep loyalty—something progressives fail to achieve by choosing caution over courage. The truth stands: great leadership demands boldness and the will to disrupt, not manufactured perfection.