From energy bills to education, from welfare to sanctuary cities, these ideas trap people in dependency, stifle opportunity, and erode self-reliance.
And that’s the point. Because an independent citizen doesn’t need big government—or the Democratic Party.
So when liberals promise to “help,” remember: what they’re really offering is control.
They call us backward, “Bible-thumping,” gun-clinging Neanderthals—too obsessed with tradition, faith, and freedom to be part of the woke utopia they’re building in the blue
For over two decades, gentle parenting reigned—with its soft tones, sticker charts, and fear of saying “no.” The result? A generation of adults who crumble under real-world pressure. As these same individuals now raise kids of their own, a new approach is rising: FAFO Parenting—where actions have consequences and structure matters. It’s not cruelty; it’s common sense. If we want resilient, capable kids, we need to stop coddling and start parenting. Because life won’t hand out participation trophies.
The media meltdown is in full swing! Once-glorified anchors—who spent years lecturing America from their multi-million-dollar studios—are now discovering the joys of unemployment. Their next career move? A brave “independent journalism project” no one will read, a podcast nobody asked for, or, if things get really bad, OnlyFans for political commentary. Yesterday, they were sipping soy lattes while preaching about misinformation. Today? They’re filming TikToks under a $15 Amazon ring light, begging for subscribers. Turns out, when your business model is hating the other side, losing your audience is just bad math.
Liberal women may preach progressivism, but when it comes to attraction, biology doesn’t care about ideology. Confidence, dominance, and raw masculinity win every time—traits conservative men tend to embody effortlessly. While liberal men overanalyze and self-reflect, their right-leaning counterparts take charge, make decisions, and exude stability. It’s a paradox no one wants to admit: the same women who champion gender fluidity often find themselves drawn to unapologetically masculine men. Politics may shape opinions, but primal instinct dictates desire—and no amount of woke theory can override human nature.
Bold leaders thrive on risk-taking and raw authenticity, traits driven by biological factors like testosterone. These characteristics generate transformative results but invite controversy. Where conservative leaders leverage imperfection to shatter the status quo, progressives crumble under self-imposed “purity tests” that paralyze innovation. The decisive authenticity of leaders like Trump, Musk, and Branson creates deep loyalty—something progressives fail to achieve by choosing caution over courage. The truth stands: great leadership demands boldness and the will to disrupt, not manufactured perfection.
This article examines the impact of allowing transgender athletes in women’s sports, focusing on the physical risks to female competitors, the violation of privacy in locker rooms and restrooms, and the failure of Title IX to protect girls and women. Featuring activist Riley Gaines as a hero for advocating fairness, the piece calls for safeguarding the dignity, safety, and rights of female athletes.
Big-government meddling could soon dictate how—and when—you’re allowed to support your favorite causes. While you and other everyday donors face new hoops to jump through, huge institutions glide by, untouched. This isn’t just political chatter—it’s a direct swipe at your power to make an impact. Don’t let a handful of elites call the shots on your generosity. Read on to see what’s really going on and how you can push back.
When the ethicist Peter Singer proposed in 1993 that a newborn cannot be a “person” until 30 days old, it did so only as a rule. This unseemly plan involved granting doctors the power to euthanize disabled infants at the moment – a declaration that horrified people and shocked moral circles. Five years later, Singer had been made the Decamp Professor of Bio-Ethics at Princeton University, which made him credible in the eyes of the academy.