DEPARTMENT

Hypocrisy Files

When public virtue doesn’t match private behavior, we take note.
This category documents double standards among institutions, elites, and public figures—using facts, receipts, and their own words.

Liberal Policies That Hurt the Very People They Claim to Help

From energy bills to education, from welfare to sanctuary cities, these ideas trap people in dependency, stifle opportunity, and erode self-reliance.
And that’s the point. Because an independent citizen doesn’t need big government—or the Democratic Party.
So when liberals promise to “help,” remember: what they’re really offering is control.

Read More »
Texas highway welcome sign with car, caption asks why families are moving to conservative red states

If Conservatives Are So Bad, Why Are Families Flocking to Red States?

They call us backward, “Bible-thumping,” gun-clinging Neanderthals—too obsessed with tradition, faith, and freedom to be part of the woke utopia they’re building in the blue states. We’re mocked for our “outdated” values, ridiculed for our distrust of big government, and painted as a national embarrassment on late-night television. Yet somehow, oddly enough… they keep moving in. Red State Real Estate: Hotter Than a Texas Summer It’s no longer anecdotal—the data proves it. Liberal strongholds like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey are bleeding residents. Meanwhile, Texas, Florida, Tennessee, and the Carolinas are welcoming a tsunami of new neighbors—many of them former blue-state believers. According to U.S. Census Bureau migration data and U-Haul’s annual Growth Index, here’s what we’ve seen: California lost over 500,000 residents in just two years (2021–2023) New York lost over 400,000 in the same period Illinois has seen net losses for 9 consecutive years Meanwhile: Texas gained over 880,000 new residents between 2020 and 2023 Florida welcomed nearly 700,000 Tennessee and North Carolina have become top destinations for new business relocations You read that right. People are leaving cities with Whole Foods on every corner and electric car charging stations in every parking lot… and moving

Read More »
Red presidential cap with visor flying over the White House in the United States. Cap of a Republican politician.

Conservative Politicians, Charlie Kirk, and Donald Trump Cower on Epstein

Once demanding truth about Jeffrey Epstein, Charlie Kirk now says he’s “done” talking. Republicans who once called for justice have gone quiet. As Epstein’s files gather dust, questions remain—and accountability vanishes. If Trump is implicated, don’t Americans deserve answers? Silence, now, speaks louder than any campaign slogan ever could.

Read More »
Raised fist painted with American flag symbolizing unity between political parties on national security and Iran policy.

What Do Obama and Trump Have In Common?

Hint: It’s Not Just the 5 Letters Obama’s Iran Doctrine “I will stand with Israel if they are attacked. And this is the reason why, working with Israel, we have created the strongest military and intelligence cooperation between our two countries in history… But to the issue of Iran, as long as I’m president of the United States Iran will not get a nuclear weapon. I made that clear when I came into office.” Iran will not get a nuclear weapon. Barack ObamaJuly 2015 Those are the words of former President Barack Obama on the debate stage in October 2012. Sparring over foreign policy with Republican nominee Mitt Romney, President Obama underscored the importance of dissolving the Iran threat as to maintain peace within the global order. During this debate, President Obama spoke largely in favor of brutal sanctions against Iran, targeting their oil industry and crippling their economy. “And the reason we did this is because a nuclear Iran is a threat to our national security, and it is a threat to Israel’s national security. We cannot afford to have a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region of the world,” Obama said. “Iran is a state sponsor

Read More »
Illustration of a young climate activist holding a "SAVE THE PLANET" sign while boarding a private jet, with a globe in the background — highlighting the contradiction between environmental messaging and high-carbon behavior.

The Carbon Saint and Her 2.6 Million Plastic Bottles

She shamed the world over plastic bottles—then flew 12,000 miles to say it again. Her trip burned enough energy to produce 2.6 million of them. But hey, she reused her hotel towels. #HypocrisyFiles Tweet Greta scolded the world over plastic straws, meat consumption, and weekend flights—declaring a planetary emergency that demanded your sacrifice. Then she hopped on a 12,000-mile international speaking tour that consumed enough energy to manufacture 2.6 million plastic bottles. But don’t worry: she reused her hotel towels. This is climate righteousness as performance art—clean optics, dirty fuel. And while Westerners are hectored over dinner choices, the real culprits—unchecked industrial waste from South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America—remain comfortably unmentioned. Because the guilt isn’t about carbon. It’s about control. The Sermon vs. the Schedule Greta’s message was urgent: the planet is on fire, and your lifestyle is the match. No more short flights, no more red meat, and definitely no more single-use plastics. Every decision must serve the cause. But the execution? Different sermon, different standard. She skipped the plastic but boarded planes. She scolded emissions while generating them by the ton. Speaking tours that could’ve been livestreamed became globe-trotting rituals of climate purity. All optics, no consistency.

Read More »
>