Liberal women are in full meltdown mode, struggling to process Trump’s epic defeat of Kamala Harris. Word on the street? Plan B is flying off pharmacy shelves—because obviously, Trump’s return means we’re one step away from living in a Handmaid’s Tale reboot. Grab your bonnets, ladies!
The murmur in Democratic circles is one of apprehension, a collective holding of the breath. It seems some talking heads are worried that after an unrelenting barrage of lawsuits, investigations, and a media circus that barely came up for air, Trump might look to “settle the score.” Or, as the more dramatic might say, “take revenge.” But isn’t that telling? If they’re so worried about payback, perhaps they’re aware that their tactics, well… weren’t exactly fair play.
In 2024, the Democratic Party’s $1 billion campaign aimed at defeating Donald Trump met surprising setbacks. The Harris campaign invested heavily in celebrity endorsements and costly events, culminating in a $25 million deficit.
This is not a Trump issue. Every nation has immigration laws and violating them has consequences. The United States is no exception. Immigration laws exist for a reason: to regulate who enters and resides in a country, ensuring fairness and security. The United States has clear legal pathways for those seeking to immigrate, and bypassing those processes is a violation of federal law.
This article examines the different interpretations of compassion and philanthropy between liberals and conservatives. Progressive ideals often favor immediate inclusivity, sometimes at the expense of broader societal stability and well-being.
In the wake of Trump’s victory, Ivy League campuses like Harvard and Yale provided students with “safe spaces,” coloring books, and other soothing activities to cope with distress. What happens when these kids face real-world adversity?